User Tools

Site Tools


base:loops_vs_unrolled

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

base:loops_vs_unrolled [2015-04-17 04:32] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +======= Loops vs unrolled loops =======
  
 +Often we got tought to unroll loops to save on the overhead a loop gives us by having to decrease a counter and involving another branch. But there are situation where a loop can perform way faster, as we can set up values directly via code modification. A good example is a line algorithm.
 +
 +Here we need to subtract for e.g. dx from A and in case of underrun add dy to A and advance the x-position. On every change in y-direction we also want to plot.
 +
 +This could look like:
 +<​code>​
 +back
 +         tax
 +         lda pix
 +         ora (dst),y
 +         sta (dst),y
 +         dey
 +         bmi out
 +         txa
 +         sbc dx
 +         bcs back
 +
 +move_x
 +         adc dy
 +
 +         asl pix
 +         bcc back
 +
 +         tax
 +         lda #$80
 +         eor dst
 +         sta dst
 +         bmi back+1
 +         inc dst+1
 +         bne back+1
 +out
 +         rts
 +</​code>​
 +
 +Now if we unroll the main loop, we would get:
 +<​code>​
 +back
 +         tax
 +         lda pix
 +         ora (dst),y
 +         sta (dst),y
 +         dey
 +         ...
 +         
 +         txa
 +         sbc dx
 +         bcs back
 +move_x
 +</​code>​
 +
 +This means we would invest 25 cycles if we neglect the cycles needed for moving in x-direction. Now let us do the same as loop again, but let us set up dst, dx, pix and dy directly:
 +
 +<​code>​
 +back
 +         tax
 +pix      lda #$00
 +dst1     ora $2000,y
 +dst2     sta $2000,y
 +         dey
 +         bmi out
 +
 +         txa
 +dx       sbc #$00
 +         bcs back
 +move_x
 +</​code>​
 +
 +As you see, all of a sudden we need 24 cycles per run, so the loop is faster! Why not setting up the immediate values within the speedcode you might think? Well, this means, that at a minimum, you waste another 4 cycles per loop run and value to be set up, while in our case we just waste an initial 4 cycles per value, what is pretty fair.
 +
 +Even more, now the loop variant of our code gives us better access to illegal opcodes as some of them work with immediate values only, like the SBX command:
 +
 +<​code>​
 +back
 +pix      lda #$00
 +dst1     ora $2000,y
 +dst2     sta $2000,y
 +         dey
 +         bpl out
 +
 +         txa
 +dx       sbx #$00         ;now we get the value of A transfered to X for free after subtraction ​
 +                          ;and A is free again for other purposes
 +         bcs back
 +move_x
 +</​code>​
 +
 +We now end up with 22 cycles per run and just a few bytes of code. So as you see, sometimes it is also worth trying to optimize a loop before brainlessly unrolling everything :-)
 +
 +Now as our code shrunk to a reasonable size, one could also think of copying that code to zeropage once and thus speed up the further code manipulation happening when setting up the loop and when executing the code in move_x.
base/loops_vs_unrolled.txt ยท Last modified: 2015-04-17 04:32 (external edit)